申し訳ありません。このコンテンツはただ今、英語のみとなります。 For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.

Creativity in the Age of AI: Human Architectural Authenticity

How can someone be authentic in the presence of an AI software that seems, at times, to act closest to what a divine being would — generating features, faces, emotional expressions, and endless design possibilities in less than seven days? The question sounds almost theological, yet it is, in truth, the central concern of our age of design. For when a machine can create not only faster but also with a strange, uncanny intimacy — as though it knows our dreams before we do — the role of the human creator is cast into unsettling relief.

What, after all, is authenticity when confronted with a partner who never tires, never doubts, and never requires the slow, fumbling process by which humans usually arrive at beauty? We are accustomed to associating authenticity with effort, with the long apprenticeship of failure and correction, with the sense that what we make is precious precisely because it cost us time, uncertainty, and pain. But AI dissolves this old contract. It offers us beauty without the suffering, elegance without the errors, perfection without the apprenticeship. We are left to wonder: is what comes too easily still ours in any meaningful sense?

"AI and design trends are influencing each other so closely that it’s often hard to tell which inspires the other,” Marco Zoni, digital designer and MidJourney specialist based in Milan, Italy. “AI allows creators to push the boundaries of reality, giving life to projects that spark new trends, while traditional design provides the foundation and inspiration. This mix can lead to surreal results, but also elevates real design to a new level—ushering in a new technological era for architecture. Social media acts more as a vehicle than a trendsetter, helping creators reach wider audiences. 'Insta-tecture'—a blend of real and surreal—demonstrates this power: starting from reality, AI enables projects to be shared broadly and inspire real architecture, continuing the cycle.”

Works by Marco Zoni

There is something divine in the way AI operates, because it performs an unsettling parody of creation itself. In the biblical imagination, a deity calls forth worlds in six days and rests on the seventh. Here, a software collapses the week into seconds and presents us with visions of what could be — entire cities, faces, textures, and moods conjured as swiftly as we can name them. And so the human creator must face a new and painful humility: that the grandeur of imagination, once our proudest possession, may not be uniquely ours after all.

And yet, if we are honest, the value of human creativity was never in speed or efficiency. Its worth lay in its imperfections, in its ability to carry the imprint of a specific life, a particular sensibility, a set of scars and longings that no algorithm can fully encode. Authenticity, then, might survive not in what AI can generate, but in what it cannot: the subtle hesitation of a hand-drawn line, the melancholy embedded in a chosen color, the biography whispered through a detail. To design alongside the machine may not rob us of our role — it may simply require us to redefine it.

One might imagine a young designer staring at a blank sketchbook, pencil poised in hesitation, while beside them a screen delivers, in seconds, dozens of flawless visions conjured from a casual prompt — an unsettling reminder of how the burden of invention has shifted. It is not the first time creativity has faced such a tremor: painters once feared the arrival of photography, draftsmen the onset of CAD, and yet art and architecture did not perish, they transformed. The true threat of AI is not that it produces beauty too swiftly, but that it tempts us to forget why beauty mattered in the first place: as a vessel for memory, longing, and the patient drama of human imperfection. If design can now be generated in abundance, perhaps its task is no longer to dazzle with surfaces, but to restore meaning, to carry our hesitations, and to remind us — against the machine’s endless fluency — that slowness and struggle remain part of what makes creation authentically our own.

We find ourselves at a historical juncture where design is no longer judged primarily in the silence of lived experience, but in the brief, merciless theatre of the feed. An image, once the final echo of a creative act, has now become its birthplace. A chair, a room, even a fragment of a façade must rehearse its digital performance before it dares to stand in the physical world. This is the paradox of what we might call Insta-tecture: architecture designed not only for inhabitation, but for circulation — to be consumed, admired, and forgotten at the speed of a swipe.

And yet, to lament this would be too simple. The so-called tyranny of the algorithm is also a confession of a deeply human longing: to be seen, to share beauty, to confirm one another’s sense of what is moving or profound. AI, with its dazzling ability to conjure entire worlds from fragments of text and mood, accelerates this impulse. It collapses the distance between fantasy and proposal, between whim and form, making the designer less an isolated author and more a curator of infinite possibilities.

"The combination of AI and social media is pushing design trends toward speed and stronger visual impact. Yet it also raises a concern: works that require time to unfold and invite deeper reflection risk being overlooked. Whether this 'visual-first' wave will reduce space for truly soulful creations is a question worth watching," said Rin Haneda, an AI filmmaker based in Japan and Taiwan.

"Creators are no longer just designers—they are also their own promoters. On Instagram, for example, most viewers spend less than three seconds on a video, and the algorithm uses this fleeting attention to determine reach. As a result, creators are compelled to place their most eye-catching visuals at the very start, favoring highlights over full narratives," added Haneda.

A screenshot from Rin Haneda’s Instagram highlighting the need for attractive covers to grab attention.

Perhaps, then, the true building material of our time is not glass, steel, or stone, but attention. And as unnerving as this may sound, it offers a rare invitation: to ask whether design can still console, dignify, and nurture us — even when its most enduring foundations are measured not in centuries, but in seconds, on a screen. And perhaps, in the delicate tension between human imperfection and machine perfection, we find a new kind of beauty—one that reminds us that our creativity is not merely measured by speed or scale, but by the subtlety of our attention, the patience of our thought, and the quiet honesty of our mistakes.